Over the years, “made in China,” I was taught was a labeling we needed to avoid. If it’s not for the reason that we can get a similar product that was made 100% locally, including all raw materials, it was because, I was told, coming from China, it was a safe assumption that the materials used during production were contaminated in some way.
Whether the concerns were lead in paint or BPA in plastic, especially in children’s toys bought from local “dollar” stores, the notion was to avoid those products completely, but at what price? I want to save money dammit!
Many people pride themselves as bargain shoppers, so much so that when they can save a penny, a buck or two, or even twenty, knowing “it all adds up,” they ignore other important details. Heck if it isn’t going to kill us today then buy it anyway, might be their rationale.
They have coupons in hand to further retain the title of “frugal,” or “bargain shopper,” or “money saver.”
And, well, retailers getting shipments from China have a lot of markup room to play with, and can still be competitive, even when offering items at a buck or two, and even with one or more middlemen profiting from the sale. Why is that? One of a few reasons is that the raw materials aren’t fit to be used and can be attained at very low costs, according to some reports.
We want all toys for our children to be 100% China free
We made a rule when our children were born that no products from China, i.e. toys from the local dollar store, etc. were to be bought for them from well intentioned friends and relatives.
Well, that rule has slowly and surely vanished, to the point us parents are making the purchases. Did we somehow forget, or in our surrendering from the battle with bargain savvy family members wanting to buy cheap plastic toys for our kids, or toys with lead, etc., did that create surrender in ourselves as well? Seems so.
100% China free, heavy-metal free food
Now, let’s look at food. Arguments of “they won’t put the toys in their mouths so there is nothing to worry about” are first of all nonsense, but the same argument cannot be used in favour of food.
I choose gluten-free for a reason, I prefer casein-free, sugar-free, additive-free, basically everything-free and I just want my family to consume whole foods from the Earth that were grown with the least amount of chemicals as humanly possible.
I just want to feed my children nature’s bounty, and I still get grief saying that I am depriving my children, but I digress. The point of this article is to discuss the importance of the label 100% China free, for nearly any product, and especially food.
There’s been discussion about dog and cat food with ingredients from China that is killing the animals upon consumption, or more likely after awhile as disease sets in that could be traced back to the foods they consumed.
If it seems unlikely that a human being, or company, or country would knowingly include ingredients in food that are detrimental to the health of animals, well, first that is a very naive notion when looking at the standard food promoted for humans in schools, and that are promoted as “healthy” across North America and the rest of the world.
Secondly, there is evidence of China including a contaminant in baby formula that resulted in the death of a number of babies.
So, if ingredients for humans matter not, why would they matter for animals?
And well, it’s not just toys and other products, we are getting our foods, and our vitamins from China! Or at least some of the ingredients are sourced from there. Are we making a mistake not paying closer attention to food sources, and is this all hype playing on fears to push products?
It has been recently brought to light again, about the level of contamination and heavy metals that are “allowed” to be included in foods that can still be labelled as organic.
So, yes, contaminants can and sometimes do exist in organically labelled foods according to Mike Adams. It’s almost as puzzling at first as hearing that reality TV is scripted.
Organic food probably still shouldn’t be given a bad rap though, as it remains for many-a-farmer as an attempt to get food as clean, and therefore as healthy as possible, but we certainly don’t want to source products from countries, or companies, or retailers, that exploit the loopholes of “organic” to make more money, or to sell cheaper products, without disclosing that not all measures were made to ensure the sanctity of the foods.
You know something? If some foods were labelled appropriately, such as, “watered with polluted river water,” some people, my guess is, really wouldn’t care, and the product would still sell to the proud “bargain hunters” if sitting on the shelf next to the same product that is labelled “watered with clean pure water,” providing it would save them a penny or more.
Is China really the bad guy, or the only one, in all this?
I want to know, where are the compassionate people that are in a position to make a difference, the people that care about fellow man, and feel that we deserve the right to know where are food, its ingredients, and its seed, comes from, and what it is comprised of, and whether it was modified under a microscope?
Or perhaps, rather than pointing the finger at who is doing what that is wrong, perhaps people should be saying to heck with it all, and just commit to consuming wild foods. Are there people that live completely off wild foods that can show us the way?
In that case, labels such as organic, 100% China-free, gluten-free, pesticide-free, and so on, would be moot.
My guess though, is that very few want to live like that, so what is the next best choice? Whatever it is, I think people are going to have to learn to set aside a portion of the day specifically for food sourcing. Perhaps less time spent reading about the negativity in the world would grant us that extra time!
Photo credits:
cpsc.gov toy recall
adamcohn – flickr
mediaroots.org